A number of key points:
- Open source dispels the "mysticism factor" that intellectual property rights evoke. [that is, "i know the secret, you don't, you want what i got, you will pay dearly for it"]
- Open source enables education and thus empowers all who seek out open source information
- Open source enables afford-ability factor that is diminished by the profit motive - the old "no margin, no mission" maxim
- Open source favors the collaborative effort and discourages competitive behavior
- open source invites creativity. Anyone can alter or adapt the open source to their own use and needs
- open source = afford-able? (is this true? it seems like it should be. Is it still a matter of economies of scale and scope?)
2 comments:
testing that comments is enabled
test one
Post a Comment